|
Post by tom on Feb 4, 2021 8:07:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by King Kodiak on Feb 4, 2021 8:16:06 GMT -5
Most likely just driven off. Rarely anyone dies.
|
|
|
Post by tom on Feb 4, 2021 8:23:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by tom on Feb 4, 2021 8:27:31 GMT -5
Most likely just driven off. Rarely anyone dies. That is likely true unless the Wolves snatch up a cub but even that would be rare as Momma Grizzly will be in very close proximity to her cubs.
|
|
|
Post by King Kodiak on Feb 4, 2021 9:55:30 GMT -5
Most likely just driven off. Rarely anyone dies. That is likely true unless the Wolves snatch up a cub but even that would be rare as Momma Grizzly will be in very close proximity to her cubs. According to data provided by Thenormalguy, at Yellowstone National Park, from 1995-2019, seven grizzly cubs have been killed and one black bear cub. Not much in 24 years, bears do a great job:
domainofthebears.proboards.com/post/47810/thread
|
|
|
Post by brobear on Apr 28, 2021 7:28:23 GMT -5
Quote: Most serious interactions between the species occur around wolf dens (Peterson et al. 1984). Quote: “I do not think wolves would have much luck killing one regardless of how many,” Stahler explained. “We have packs of 15 or more wolves that regularly interact with grizzly bears at carcasses and they are too risk averse to engage aggressively with grizzlies.” *Easy to grasp: A pack of wolves will rarely risk the sacrifice of a pack member for a carcass. But, they will risk life-and-limb to defend their cubs.
|
|
|
Post by OldGreenGrolar on Apr 28, 2021 7:55:41 GMT -5
Pack members are an important asset for wolves in bringing down big prey and protecting their pups.
|
|
|
Post by brobear on May 21, 2021 7:33:14 GMT -5
OK, here is another way of explaining my thoughts on this matter. Let's say that there are two families living in the woods ( midieval times ). There are the Normans and the Nelsons. Us Normans run in packs. Very rarely will you see a Norman wandering in the woods alone. The Nelson's, on the other hand, are basically loners. You rarely see a group of Nelsons. In these medieval woods, Nelsons and Normans compete for food; especially meat. There are just about as many members of one family in these woods as there are the other. If a group of Normans kill a boar hog, and a Nelson decides to try and take it from us, and there is a fight, this fight will be bloody. Nelsons are really big guys; Normans generally smaller. If this fight ends with the one Nelson dead along with two dead Normans, then which family suffers the greater loss? Nelsons = bears. Normans = wolves.
|
|
|
Post by tom on May 21, 2021 9:52:39 GMT -5
OK, here is another way of explaining my thoughts on this matter. Let's say that there are two families living in the woods ( midieval times ). There are the Normans and the Nelsons. Us Normans run in packs. Very rarely will you see a Norman wandering in the woods alone. The Nelson's, on the other hand, are basically loners. You rarely see a group of Nelsons. In these medieval woods, Nelsons and Normans compete for food; especially meat. There are just about as many members of one family in these woods as there are the other. If a group of Normans kill a boar hog, and a Nelson decides to try and take it from us, and there is a fight, this fight will be bloody. Nelsons are really big guys; Normans generally smaller. If this fight ends with the one Nelson dead along with two dead Normans, then which family suffers the greater loss? Nelsons = bears. Normans = wolves. Us Nelson's would never lose to a Norman, one on one or one against a whole clan of Normans.
|
|
|
Post by brobear on May 21, 2021 18:10:51 GMT -5
Quote: Us Nelson's would never lose to a Norman, one on one or one against a whole clan of Normans. Them sound like fight'n words you varment!
|
|